In Defense of the Constitution

acairlogo

Analysis and Commentary


006/04

February 14, 2004



 

- CAIR:  Condemning “Hate Filled Comments?”

 

- CAIR:  Opposing Common Sense in Education Policy?

 

- Advisory to Members of the Armed Forces

 





CAIR:  Condemning “Hate Filled Comments?”

 

   On February 13, 2004, the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) printed an article on their web site regarding the Democratic National Committee’s issuance of a press release concerning comments made by Rep. Peter King (R-NY).  Anti-CAIR (ACAIR) commented on this in our  “Analysis and Commentary” dated February 13, 2004.

 

   In part, CAIR writes:

 

The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) today applauded the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) condemnation of claims made by rep. Peter T. King (R-NY) that “85 percent” of American Muslim community leaders are “an enemy living amongst us” and that “no (American) Muslims” cooperate in the war on terror.”

 


   CAIR, one of Americas most bigoted, hate filled, anti-American “civil rights” groups has the impudence to:

 

    -  Condemn ANYONE for any comments.  Since when has CAIR earned the right to speak for American Muslims?

 

    -  Quote a press release from one of the major American political parties. CAIR supports militant Islam, which is anti-Democratic by nature.

 

    -  Call on Rep. King to meet with Muslim representatives.  No Senator, Congressman or member of the administration should have any contact with CAIR.  CAIR has nothing to add to the discussion on any subject.

 


   Why is ACAIR concerned about CAIR’s comments?  Consider:


 

1.  Several SENIOR members of CAIR have been arrested for supporting militant Islam:

 

    a.  CAIR official Bassem K. Khafagi who has plead guilty to charges of visa and bank fraud in federal court in Detroit.

 

    b. Ghassan Elashi, arrested in December of 2002 for dealing in the property of a designated terrorist, was a founder of the Holy Land Foundation and a member of the founding board of Directors of CAIR-Texas.

 

    c.  Randall Todd Royer who has pleaded guilty to various terrorism-related charges and is awaiting sentencing.

 

  This is a very short list of the number of CAIR officers whom have been tied to militant Islam.


 

2.  CAIR’s leadership is on record as being in support of militant Islamic causes, including (but not limited to) Hamas, the group believed to have recently terror-murdered three Americans in the Gaza strip who were on a peaceful educational mission.

 

   We believe CAIR to be a militant Islamist organization that hides behind the label of being a “civil rights organization” in order to advance its brand of Wahhabi Islam. 

 

   It would do well to remember the words of Senator Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat who stated that prominent members of CAIR; referring specifically to Nihad Awad and Omar Ahmad have intimate links with Hamas.   Later, he remarked that “we know [CAIR] has ties to terrorism.”

 

   No good can come to the DNC or the GOP from cooperating with CAIR, a group that has “ties to terrorism”.



   Was this story in your local newspaper?  Why not?

 

 





CAIR:  Opposing Common Sense in Education Policy?


 
On February 13, 2004, the Council on American Islamic relations (CAIR) issued an “American Muslim News Brief” (not yet posted to CAIR’s web site) calling for opposition to a Senate bill.

 

  In the words of CAIR:

 

“CAIR is urging American Muslims and other people who value academic freedom to contact their senators, particularly members of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, to express opposition to the creation of an International Studies Advisory Board that could be part of the Senate counterpart to H.R. 3077, the Education Reauthorization Act now being drafted by the HELP Committee.”

 

“Section 633 of the Education Reauthorization Act calls for the creation of an advisory board consisting of at least two appointees that represent national security agencies overseeing curricula, course materials and the recruitment of faculty that accept federal government money for international studies.  While Asian, African, European, and Latin American area studies programs will be affected, Middle Eastern studies programs are the real target of the advisory board.”

 

“The advisory board could serve to stifle academic freedom by suppressing any views that are not viewed as supportive of Israel and in line with Muslim-bashers like Daniel Pipes, who has been actively pushing for the oversight board.”

 

“Pipes faced a storm of criticism when he launched Campus Watch, a web site that included “dossiers” on professors and academic institutions thought to be too critical of Israel or too sympathetic to Islam and Muslims.”

 

“In a January 13th Washington Post article, Pipes claimed “Middle East Studies have not served us well” and that the board will serve to “…supervise the distribution of government funds…of what he considers to be the radical Middle East studies lobby centered in universities such as Columbia, Georgetown and the University of Chicago.”

 

“H.R. 3077 passed the House floor with little notice of academic freedom concerns.”

 

“At a time when congress is pushing for democracy and academic freedom in the Middle East, it is critical that we uphold these values in our own universities,” said CAIR Governmental Affairs Coordinator Hasan Mansori.”



 

   CAIR is clearly making their position known: U.S. taxpayers should support any Middle Eastern education project without any oversight.

 

   Would American taxpayers be pleased to know that their tax money could support “educational” projects that foster anti-Americanism?  How about taxpayer support for maddrassas?  We already know what militant Islamists think of Americans who support education programs in the Gaza strip, they kill them.

 

   Do we really want to be taking policy advice from CAIR, a group that has ties to militant Islam?

 

 



Advisory to Members of the Armed Forces

 

   Members of the Armed Forces are advised that it is a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) to use a government-supplied computer or telecommunications device for personal business.  If you are in doubt, consult your unit’s written policy on the use of government supplied equipment BEFORE doing so.

 

 




ACAIR is pleased to answer any questions from the public and press.

 

Your comments, suggestions and tips are appreciated and all e-mail is read.

 

You may request our press releases by writing:

 

 

Andrew Whitehead
ACAIR
ajwhitehead@anti-cair-net.org
www.anti-cair-net.org

 

ADVISORY:
Subscribers are warned that the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) may contact your employer if CAIR believes you are using a work address to receive any material that CAIR believes may be offensive.  CAIR has been known to shame employers into firing employees CAIR finds disagreeable.  For that reason, we strongly suggest that corporate e-mail users NOT use a corporate e-mail account/address when communicating with ACAIR We make every reasonable effort to protect our mailing list, but we cannot guarantee confidentiality. ACAIR does not share, loan, sell, rent or otherwise publicize our mailing list.  We respect your privacy!

TIPS:
All persons are invited to submit tips and leads.  
ACAIR will acknowledge receipt of all tips/leads, but we will NOT acknowledge the source of ANY tip or lead in our Press Releases or on our web site. Exceptions are made for leading media personalities at the discretion of ACAIR and only on request of the person(s) submitting the tip or lead.