"All of this doesn't help build trust with
the American Muslim community, and that is vital if our
law enforcement is going to fight terrorism,"..."If anyone can improve
security, it's our
community, but we need to be seen as trusted partners, not potential
suspects."
Unbelievable...this
from a "man" who arguably dishonored both his
officer's commissioning oath and the US Army uniform he wore while
"ministering" to Islamic terrorists detained at the detention facility
in
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba...a
man without honor presumes to lecture anyone about trust?
James Yee,
poster boy of the
Front Group
created for Hamas - CAIR, has
the nerve to act as
if he speaks for the American Muslim community and tell us that we
should have "trusted" that the Fort Dix Six were nothing but innocent
gun-toting
Boy Scouts
not worthy of any investigation?
Not everyone in
the convicted men's
community agrees with Yee.
Fuat "Mike" Mamo of Cresskill, New Jersey had this to say,
specifically of the three Albanian born brothers who were convicted:
"I
don't know what they were thinking...they were just out of their mind
and they should be
put away for life. The Albanian community is nothing like this... we
come from a country
that has a reputation for religious diversity and tolerance. To
go against the American
government, that's unacceptable to our community."
Jim Sues, executive director of the
Anti-CAIR sought the opinion of a
respected American Muslim on the subject of the Fort Dix Six
convictions and the statements of CAIR and James Yee.
Dr. M.
Zuhdi Jasser of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy
was kind enough to provide the following response:
I
never ceased
to be amazed at the depths to which Islamist
groups like CAIR and their supporters like James Yee will stoop to
find
some
kind of fault with the prosecution, whether fact or fiction, when they
are
faced with a conviction by a jury of our peers.
The hypocrisy of
Islamist
organizations like CAIR has no limits. Ibrahim Hooper, NIhad Awad, and
CAIR had
the temerity to send
out a
press
release on November 24, 2008, asking
President-elect Obama to “restore the rule of law” reiterating Awad’s
words
before a national CAIR audience in D.C at their annual banquet.
That press
release was sent out on the heels of the convictions
of the leadership
of the
Holy Land Foundation in Dallas on all counts for funding terrorism.
CAIR had a
problem with that example
of ‘the rule of law’.
On December
22,
2008, Jim Sues, executive director of the New
Jersey chapter of CAIR also certainly seems to have a problem
with the “rule
of law.” He stated that “many people in the Muslim community will see
this as a case of entrapment…from what I saw
there was a significant
role
played by the government informant”.
Not only did
the jury disagree with that, but Patrick Rowan,
assistant US attorney general for national security said it best, “The
word
should go out to any other would-be terrorists of the homegrown
variety
that the United States will find you, infiltrate your group, prosecute
you and
send you to a federal prison for a very long time.” That is exactly
what
we should be hearing from my fellow coreligionists. We
should as a
faith
community be putting every would-be militant Islamist on notice that
our
community will have zero tolerance for any
behaviors which are
militant. Not
only will the government infiltrate these groups but the organized
Muslim
community will help them do it.
Rather than
give us such long overdue reassurances, CAIR’s
apologists again prove that when it comes to the rule of law there
appears
to
be a different one for Islamists than for those adjudicated by juries
in New
Jersey or Dallas. James Yee also provided an incredulous
comment after
the
guilty verdict. “All this doesn’t help build trust with the
American Muslim community, and that is vital if our law enforcement
is
going to
fight terrorism.” Mr. Yee, please speak for yourself and cease
and
desist representing yourself as a spokesperson for the
American Muslim
Community
and I am personally offended that you are touted as a representative of
American
Muslims who are former
military officers. As a
former US Navy
Lieutenant
commander, I take great umbrage with an individual who has not only
taken the
oath of
citizenship but that of a
US military officer and yet portrays
a
sentiment that he and thus by inference, ‘the American Muslim
community’
has a problem with
government informants and their efforts to
infiltrate
possible jihadist cells. With Mr. Yee’s pronouncements on the heels
of
this
case, it becomes difficult to see when he would ever find it
appropriate for
the government to do its job and infiltrate radical cells with
whom
they have
probable cause and stop their activities.
Mr. Yee, we
have an obligation as citizens and as officers to
our oath and to uphold the law regardless of any other allegiance to a
faith
group or political movement like Islamists. Mr. Yee goes on to say
that, “If
anyone can improve security, it’s our community, but we need
to be seen
as trusted partners, not potential suspects.” It is certainly
interesting
that Mr. Yee seems to identify with the individuals who
now stand
convicted of
conspiracy to kill military personnel. I certainly do not and if
anything the
fact that they called themselves Muslims
makes it more important that
they be
made an example of by the Muslim community in my own estimation.
It is truly sad
that such offensive comments are touted as
representing the sentiments of the American Muslim community. In fact,
if media
were to interview non-Islamist or better yet, anti-Islamist
Muslims
they would
find many of us celebrating the verdict and encouraging
continued
heroic reporting
like that of the store clerk which led ultimately to the infiltration
and
conviction. From Mr. Yee’s comments, it
would appear that he would have
not reported the video to authorities as reporting these jihadists and
looking
upon them as ‘potential
suspects’ would alienate Muslims- his
Muslims that is. Sorry, but law-abiding Muslims who believe in our oath
to protect
the US from
enemies foreign and domestic will report jihadist activity
as soon
as we see it and leave it to the authorities and the justice system and
the
“rule of law” which we swore to uphold to determine their guilt or
innocence. These individuals stand convicted and Mr. Yee, Mr. Sues,
and
other Islamist
apologists from CAIR cannot get themselves to laud the tireless efforts
of our
Homeland Security and Justice Departments.
Their comments speak volumes
to the
problems endemic among those who believe in the ideology of political
Islam. To
them, justice is not
about American security or the rule of law as
defined by
evidentiary procedures in the United States. Rather to the Islamist,
justice is
about
preferential treatment for Islamist Muslims over the rule of law
which is
thankfully applied in this country blind to one’s personal religious
practice. Draw a cartoon, criticize an Islamist, or report unusual
activity on an
airplane and the wrath of Islamist leaders will be brought upon
you.
However, be
convicted of a conspiracy to kill military personnel by a jury and
CAIR’s
apologists will find a reason to apologize for the
verdict and put
America on
warning that they will not help improve security if these types of
criminals
are targeted.
M. Zuhdi Jasser
President, AIFD
*************************
'Nuff said
...
Andrew Whitehead
Director
Anti-CAIR
ajwhitehead@anti-cair-net.org
www.anti-cair-net.org
Story Links:
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/12/23/america/Fort-Dix-Plot-Optional.php
http://www.philly.com/philly/wires/ap/news/state/pennsylvania/20081222_ap_manymuslimsskepticaloffortdixverdicts.html
http://www.nypost.com/seven/05132007/news/regionalnews/clerk_rings_up_n_j__jihad_jerks_regionalnews_jana_winter______post_correspondent.htm?page=0
http://www.anti-cair-net.org/press_032_05.html
http://www.anti-cair-net.org/FBItiesCAIRHamas
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2008/10/jurors_in_fort_dix_case_find_i.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,270601,00.html
http://www.aifdemocracy.org/
ADVISORY:
Please use a
non-corporate/non-work e-mail address if you contact CAIR or Anti-CAIR
or receive our material. CAIR may attempt to shame your employer
into terminating you if they believe you are receiving "objectionable"
material. We make every reasonable effort to protect our mailing list,
but we cannot guarantee confidentiality. Anti-CAIR does not share,
loan, sell, rent or otherwise publicize our mailing list. We
respect your privacy!
TIPS:
All persons are invited to
submit tips and leads. Anti-CAIR will acknowledge receipt of all
tips/leads, but we will NOT acknowledge the source of ANY tip or lead
in our Press Releases or on our web site. Exceptions are made for
leading media personalities at the discretion of Anti-CAIR and only on
request of the person(s) submitting the tip or lead.