1. The event was CAIR sponsored.
2. Mr. Ayloush has been a principal officer of the CAIR
organization in California since at least
March 1998
(This is two months before the May, 1998 event). (He did not attend
the event).
3. Mr. Ayloush has not sought to disassociate himself,
or CAIR-Southern California from the comments made at the event by Mr.
Wagdi Ghunaym (Egyptian militant Islamic leader). At the event, Mr.
Ghunaym called Jews “descendants of the apes”.
4. If Mr. Ayloush is not anti-Semitic, why did he not condemn
this obviously anti-Semitic remark? Did Mr. Ayloush complain to CAIR
national headquarters about this remark? Did he resign from
CAIR-CA in protest over these disgusting
words?
Mr. Ayloush must be aware that he is a
principal
officer in an organization that actively supports anti-Semitism?
He does know that CAIR supports Islamic terrorism, doesn’t he?
Mr. Ayloush refers to Israeli’s as
zionazi's.
Since it is safe to assume that Mr. Ayloush is not referring to Israelis
of the Islamic faith, we infer that he is referring to Jewish Israelis?
It is safe to conclude:
1. Mr. Steel owes Mr. Ayloush an apology for claiming Mr.
Ayloush’s
presence at the event. (Is this really worth
launching a lawsuit over?).
2. Mr. Ayloush owes an apology to Jewish Israeli’s for
referring to them as “zionazi’s”.
So…in the end, who is the bigoted member of a group
that supports Hamas?
Yes, there is an apology to be made…and it
isn’t Mr. Steel who should make it.
ACAIR’s prediction? Mr. Ayloush
will drop his lawsuit after milking it for all the
free publicity
he, and CAIR, can get.