In
Defense of the Constitution
News & Analysis
041/04 December 21, 2004
- CAIR: Defending Your Right to
Free Speech?
On the Anti-CAIR web site, you will
find the following warning posted on the bottom of each archived Press
Release and News & Analysis:
“ADVISORY:
Subscribers are warned that the
Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) may contact your employer
if CAIR believes you are using a work address to receive any material
that CAIR believes may be offensive. CAIR has been known to shame
employers into firing employees CAIR finds disagreeable. For that
reason, we strongly suggest that corporate e-mail users NOT use a
corporate e-mail account/address when communicating with ACAIR or
CAIR. We make every reasonable effort to protect our mailing
list, but we cannot guarantee confidentiality. ACAIR does not share,
loan, sell, rent or otherwise publicize our mailing list. We
respect your privacy!”
ACAIR placed that advisory
on our postings because CAIR has contacted businesses and corporate
e-mail hosts in an effort to silence employees who exercise their First
Amendment rights from work, use company e-mail addresses to comment on
CAIR's statements and activities.
ACAIR has been contacted by
several people whom claimed to be subjected to CAIR harassment. One
writer has agreed to allow us to show you how this self-described
"Muslim Civil Rights Group" goes about trying to impose the Iranian or
Saudi view of free speech (i.e., there is none) on those Americans who
dare to express their views.
In August, 2004, the following e-mail was sent to CAIR:
<Begin Quote>
Subject:
Imam Ali Shrine
From Your Web Site:
U.S. Muslims Urge End to Fighting Near
Iraqi Shrine
CAIR says attack would harm America’s
image in Islamic world
A prominent national civil rights and
advocacy group today said a U.S. attack on the Imam Ali Shrine in the
Iraqi city of Najaf would harm America’s image in the Muslim world and
called for negotiations to end the fighting.
RESPONSE
The unprovoked Muslim attack on
America the killed 3,000+ people harmed the Islamic image in the
CIVILIZED world.
The Islamic radicals must be
destroyed. Their leader has an arrest warrant issued by Iraqi
courts. He is a criminal that is using “holy” sites as
protection…clear violation of Geneva Conventions. Any attacks
from “holy” sites or storage of weapons in such makes them “fair game”
for attacks or retaliation.
Negotiations???? Surely you
jest. You people called for a cease fire, which we honored, BUT
the radicals did not. They used the respite to rearm and
reorganize.
It is hard to conceive of a so-called
“religion of peace” being filled with such hatred.
<End Quote>
In the above, do we see any evidence of
insulting Islam? Imputing of criminal or terrorist intent onto the
US/Canadian Muslim community? Gratuitous name-calling or
ethnic/religious insults?
No?
Then why did CAIR send the following e-mail to
the writer’s employer?
Subject: is this e-mail
representative of your company?
Peace.
CAIR receive the following hostile e-mail apparently from a (company
name) employee. Does its content reflect your company’s views?
Ibrahim Hooper
National Communications Director
www.cair-net.org
202-488-8787
(The writers e-mail was
inserted here)
On August 16, 2004, CAIR’s Ibrahim Hooper called the
writer’s employer and left a message on his voice mail…Hooper wanted to
know if the writer’s e-mail reflected company policy and asked the
employer to call Hooper. The boss asked the writer about the
e-mail and the mix-up in the e-mail address was explained. The
writer then explained a little about CAIR’s activities and shared his
personal opinions regarding CAIR. The boss listened, agreed with
the employee and said he had no intention of calling “this guy”
back. He finished by saying he did not want some terrorist
blowing up the building.
The employee then responded to CAIR:
<Begin Quote>
Subject:
Attn: Ibrahim Hooper
Peace.
I was speaking for myself… just forgot to change to email account
to my personal account. And no it did not get me “into trouble”
as I am sure you hoped it would. You have the audacity to call my
email hostile?
I notice you did not respond to my comments. This is so
typical. As “Communications Director”, I would expect a high
profile NATIONAL response to the evil that is being perpetrated by
Muslims world wide. If CAIR does not accept this evil, why are
PROMINENT members of your faith not getting out the “truth”.
Silence sometimes speaks louder than words.
Do you deny that the cleric that has set up his battle station in the
Holy site is not wanted as a criminal under Iraqi law?
Do you deny that is trying to upset the move to democracy in Iraq?
Do you deny that the Geneva Convention forbids using churches, mosques,
temples, etc as a haven for battle sites and storage of weaponry?
Do you deny that Imams the world over are teaching hatred on
non-muslims, expecially Americans?
Do you deny that is was muslims that attacked us on 911?
Do you deny that is was muslims that attacked the USS Cole?
What about the Kobar Towers?
Speaking “Peace” is on thing and easy to do… living a life of
peace is quite another. Do you have the courage to answer my
questions? Do you have the courage to LIVE a life of peace and
acceptance of those other than muslims?
<End Quote>
Hooper did not, or could not, answer.
It seems to ACAIR that Hooper is a "free
speech bully".
He threatens and tries to intimidate Americans into
silence, but is actually absolutely terrified of a free exchange of
ideas or facts. Why are you so afraid, Doug? Is it because the
philosophy of Muslim extremism, as practiced by those who in Saudi
Arabia and elsewhere who fund CAIR simply can't stand the sunlight of
public debate and objective scrutiny? Why are you afraid of the
truth?
CAIR claims it supports civil rights…but its
actions, in ACAIR's opinion, demonstrate
that it is hostile to the First Amendment guarantee of free speech that
is the bedrock for the United States Constitution, and to many of the
Judeo-Christian values that have made the U.S. what it is today. ACAIR
believes the facts show CAIR hates free expression and free speech, and
that if it had the power of the mullahs and autocrats in
Iran/Saudi/Gaza, it would treat its critics, and critics of Muslim
violence, in the same way. ACAIR asks what next,
CAIR? Are you going to decree that anyone who criticizes you or
Muslims should be treated just like the writer Salomon Rushdie, who had
a death sentence placed on his head?
ACAIR wonders why CAIR is so
allergic to criticism, and afraid of free speech and open debate?
ACAIR asks why does CAIR try to impose
the oppression common in Saudi Arabia or Syria on Americans, here in
the U.S.?
And ACAIR
asks:
…why isn’t this
question being asked by the “mainstream” media?
Andrew Whitehead
Director
Anti-CAIR (ACAIR)
ajwhitehead@anti-cair-net.org
www.anti-cair-net.org
ADVISORY:
Subscribers
are warned that the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) may
contact your employer if CAIR believes you are using a work
address to receive any material that CAIR believes may be
offensive.
CAIR
has been known to shame employers into firing employees CAIR finds
disagreeable. For that reason, we strongly suggest that corporate
e-mail users NOT use a corporate e-mail account/address when
communicating with
ACAIR
or CAIR.
We
make every reasonable effort to protect our mailing list, but we cannot
guarantee confidentiality. ACAIR
does
not share, loan, sell, rent or otherwise publicize our mailing
list. We respect your privacy!
TIPS:
All persons are invited to submit tips and leads. ACAIR
will acknowledge receipt of all tips/leads, but we will NOT acknowledge
the source of ANY tip or lead in our Press Releases or on our web site.
Exceptions
are made for leading media personalities at the discretion of ACAIR
and
only on request of the person(s) submitting the tip or lead.